What Is the Fed’s SLOOS? Lending Standards, Terms, and Demand

SLOOS is a Federal Reserve survey of bank lending practices. Its questions ask senior loan officers whether standards and terms for selected loan categories have become tighter or easier, and whether demand has strengthened or weakened. Questions cover lending to businesses and households, with the exact categories and special questions varying across survey rounds. The [Federal Reserve’s SLOOS data page]({source:fedSloosData}) provides the survey releases and time series.

The survey records banks’ assessments of changes over a recent period. It is useful for describing reported credit conditions across respondents. It does not directly observe every loan application, contract, or balance, and it does not estimate a single market-wide lending rate. Read it as evidence about what participating loan officers report, with the survey’s question, loan category, and response period in view.

The Federal Reserve generally conducts SLOOS quarterly, though it can field additional surveys. The panel includes large domestic banks and U.S. branches and agencies of foreign banks. In the July 2026 round, 56 domestic banks and 18 U.S. branches and agencies of foreign banks responded; unless otherwise indicated, that release’s summary describes domestic-bank responses. Those counts describe that survey round, not a fixed panel size ({source:fedSloosJuly2026}). The panel is a sample of lenders, not every institution that extends credit in the United States. Its respondents, loan categories, and questions can vary, so a percentage should be understood against the banks that answered that particular question. The Fed’s [survey overview and methodology]({source:fedSloosAbout}) describes the panel and the survey design.

Most questions ask how conditions changed over the previous three months. A release can also include special questions about topics such as current standards relative to historical ranges. Before comparing two observations, check the release dates, loan categories, and wording: a special question or changed category may not be directly comparable with a regular series.

Lending standards are a bank’s policies for approving or renewing a loan. Examples include the borrower’s required credit quality, income, collateral, or debt-service capacity. Standards describe the threshold for getting approved.

Loan terms are conditions in a loan contract conditional on approval. They can include spreads over funding costs, fees, collateral requirements, loan covenants, and maximum loan size. Standards and terms are related, but a bank can leave its approval threshold unchanged while changing the price or conditions of an approved loan.

Loan demand is the bank’s report of whether eligible borrowers are seeking more or less credit. It is not a bank’s willingness to supply loans. The July 2026 survey distinguishes standards, terms, and demand in its questions and explains how the responses are summarized ({source:fedSloosJuly2026}). Keeping these three concepts separate helps avoid interpreting a fall in demand as a tightening of approval policy.

<!-- learn:illustration -->

For standards and terms, the net percentage is the share of responding banks reporting tighter conditions minus the share reporting easier conditions. For demand, it is the share reporting stronger demand minus the share reporting weaker demand. Responses that say conditions were unchanged contribute to neither side of the subtraction. In the raw public series, this is an unweighted response share: each bank answering a question counts once, regardless of its loan portfolio. The net percentage is a balance of bank responses, not a percentage change in loan volume ({source:fedSloosJuly2026}, {source:fedAggregateLendingStandardsDemand2020}).

For a hypothetical example, suppose 100 banks answer a question about business-loan standards: 60 report tightening, 25 report easing, and 15 report no change. The net percentage reporting tighter standards is 60% − 25% = +35 percentage points. It does not mean standards tightened by 35%, that every bank tightened, or that lending fell by 35%. It means the share reporting tightening exceeded the share reporting easing by 35 percentage points.

For a hypothetical loan-demand question, if 45% report stronger demand and 30% report weaker demand, the calculation is 45% − 30% = +15 percentage points. A positive number tells you which direction had more responses, not how large each bank’s change was or how many dollars of additional loans borrowers requested.

No. A change measure and a level measure answer different questions. A positive standards net percentage means more responding banks reported tightening than easing over the specified period. It does not reveal whether standards began that period unusually loose or unusually restrictive. A negative number can mean net easing while standards remain tight relative to a bank’s own history.

Some survey rounds ask separately about the current level of standards compared with a historical range. For example, the July 2026 release included questions that asked banks to place current standards in that context, apart from the regular questions about recent changes ({source:fedSloosJuly2026}). Treat a level response as a separate measure; do not infer it from the sign of the change series.

SLOOS reports what bank officers say about credit standards, terms, and demand. Actual loan balances are dollar amounts on bank balance sheets. Those balances reflect new originations as well as repayments, charge-offs, loan sales, securitizations, and other changes. A bank can report tighter standards while its outstanding loans still grow, for example if older lending remains on its books or demand is strong among borrowers who qualify.

The Federal Reserve’s H.8 release estimates weekly aggregate balance sheets for U.S. commercial banks, including loan and lease balances. Weekly levels are estimates as of close of business Wednesday. H.8 measures quantities rather than survey opinions, and its bank coverage, estimation methods, timing, and loan categories differ from SLOOS; the two series are not direct equivalents to compare line for line. The Fed’s [H.8 explanation]({source:fedH8About}) describes the release and its construction. For the separate mechanics of reserves, deposits, and bank lending, see how bank reserves and the money multiplier work.

The raw public net percentage gives each bank’s response equal weight. A 2020 Federal Reserve research note describes derived weighted indices that weight responses by each bank’s outstanding balance in the relevant loan category, then aggregate across loan categories to form broader business- and household-loan measures. Those research indices answer a different question from the raw unweighted share of banks; do not describe the latter as the share of outstanding loans affected. Check which measure a chart uses ({source:fedAggregateLendingStandardsDemand2020}).

Not on its own. Reported standards are informative about banks’ stated willingness to lend, but responses can reflect many influences: the economic outlook, borrower credit quality, funding conditions, bank capital, risk tolerance, and supervisory or regulatory considerations. Demand reports are collected separately, but a raw net percentage is not a controlled estimate of the causal effect of supply on lending or output.

Federal Reserve researchers have developed methods to identify bank credit-supply shocks using SLOOS responses together with other information and modeling assumptions. One 2024 method first estimates a bank-level regression that accounts for past standards, reported demand, macroeconomic and financial conditions, and bank-specific factors; it then aggregates the regression residuals into a Credit Supply Indicator. That derived research measure is distinct from the raw net percentage reported by the survey ({source:fedSloosCreditSupplyShocks2024}). If a chart calls an ordinary net percentage a “credit-supply shock,” check whether it describes such an additional identification method or simply relabels the survey statistic.

Start with the exact question and loan category. Check whether the line measures standards, terms, or demand; whether it is a regular question or a special one; and what period respondents were asked to compare. Then note whether the chart shows a net percentage of banks or a weighted series. A change in the net balance is not automatically a change in the dollar stock of loans.

Next, compare the survey with data that answer different questions. H.8 can show whether commercial-bank loan balances are rising or falling, while the credit-to-GDP gap compares a broad measure of credit with its long-run relationship to GDP. The Federal Reserve policy-rate and implementation guide explains policy instruments that can affect financing conditions, but SLOOS itself is not a policy-rate measure. These series differ in scope and timing, so look for a consistent story rather than expecting them to move one-for-one.

Finally, describe the result narrowly: for example, “a net share of respondents reported tighter standards for this loan category over the prior three months.” That statement identifies what the survey measured without turning responses into a forecast, a measure of total credit, or proof of a single cause.