Skip to main content
AnalyzePositioningMethodologyPricing
Sign in
← All option guides
Model limits4 minute readAug 23, 2026

What does no feasible result mean for an option target?

Understand why a pricing scenario may not contain an underlying price that matches the selected option premium

Prepared by Mark · Primary sources below

In this guide

  1. The failure belongs to one scenario
  2. Premium bounds can conflict with the target
  3. Scenario changes need an economic reason
  4. Preserve the unsuccessful comparison

Direct answer

No feasible result means the pricing calculation could not find an underlying price within its supported search range that makes the selected contract equal the target premium at the chosen checkpoint and assumptions. It is a statement about that model scenario, not a forecast that the market can never print the target, a probability estimate, or an instruction to change the position

The failure belongs to one scenario

The contract, target premium, checkpoint, implied volatility, rates, dividends, and model define the question being solved. A failure to find a matching underlying price applies only to that combination. Changing an input creates a new question rather than repairing the old answer

Premium bounds can conflict with the target

Option values have structural limits under a pricing model. A put, for example, cannot gain without limit as the underlying approaches zero, while a call target may lie beyond the calculation's supported stock-price range. Numerical stability checks can also reject an output instead of returning a boundary value that does not actually reproduce the target

Scenario changes need an economic reason

An earlier checkpoint leaves more time value, a lower target asks the model to match a smaller premium, and another volatility assumption changes the value assigned to uncertainty. Each may produce a solvable case, but inputs should reflect the question being investigated rather than being adjusted only until a number appears

Preserve the unsuccessful comparison

A no-result state is still information about the chosen assumptions. Keep the target and scenario visible, then compare one justified change at a time. That record makes clear which input restored a solution and prevents a feasible alternative from being mistaken for evidence that the original target will occur

Common questions

Does no feasible result mean the target premium is impossible?

No. It means no matching underlying price was found under the selected model inputs and supported range. Market prices and future inputs can differ, but that uncertainty does not turn the target into a forecast

Should I lower the target until the calculator returns a number?

Only if a lower target represents a scenario you genuinely want to examine. Lowering it solely to force an output hides the original question; comparing both cases is more informative

Sources and further reading

  • [1]Black-Scholes Formula
  • [2]Options Pricing
  • [3]Option Price Behavior
  • [4]Leverage & Risk

What to remember

  1. No feasible result describes a specific model scenario rather than the future market
  2. Structural bounds and solver validation can prevent a target from having a valid modeled match
  3. Change one input for a stated reason and retain the original case for comparison

See the condition behind your target

Choose a contract, target premium, and checkpoint to see what changes when time or implied volatility moves

Analyze my option →

Related guides

Compare expiration outcomes →
Why it changedWhy did my option target change since yesterday?Target priceWhat stock price does my call need to reach?Time decayHow does time decay change an option target?
Contact
Options field guideOption Profit CalculatorNVDA earnings rangeTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy© 2026 Mark